A fun take on Google’s Nano Banana. A question, something about a scheming schema (which instructional designers have a robust schema of), and a video full of nano-love made by the Nano Banana Grok Imagine duo.
Musk agrees to bring the oomph back to Tesla and buys $1B worth of shares to seal the deal. Optimus Gen3, launched recently, appears to be his pet project at Tesla as he tweets about “burning the midnight oil” with the Optimus team, and the synergy between Optimus and Grok.
The phrase that’s getting thrown around a lot these days is, “The AI bubble is about to burst!” This post presents the 6 factors that are contributing to the expanding girth of this bubble. This post also introduces the Stark Streak cartoons.
I tried out Google’s Nano Banana. Did a few simple image modifications. It’s quick, but stumbles when asked to do unexpected modifications.
Moved by the death of 16-year-old Adam Raine, I confronted ChatGPT, and its reply had a large measure of truth in it.
Is it ok to let AI write for you? A 500-word article that you’d take 2-3 hours to write can be written by AI in seconds. And it would be error-free and polished to a shine. So why won’t I let AI write for me?
As we find ourselves pulled into the vortex of AI content creation, as instructional designers, we must create our own unique framework to keep our brains safe and agile. RAD, or the 3 Baskets of AI Tasks, helps us stay sharp.
Memoirs of the times when ChatGPT 5 bumbled in, unceremoniously ousted ChatGPT 4o, only to be told its place by OpenAI’s 4o-loving customers.
© 2025 Ignite — Powered by WordPress
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑